TRANSLATE INTO HINDI

Thursday, October 16, 2025

“Can the National Education Policy 2020 Move Beyond Vision to Become a Real Catalyst for Change in India’s Education System?”, “Is NEP 2020 an Ambitious Leap Toward Educational Transformation—or Just Another Policy Promise?”




Introduction: Education as the Soul of a Nation

Education has never been merely a tool of instruction — it is the art of nation-making. A society becomes what it teaches its children to value. India’s National Education Policy 2020 thus represents not just an educational reform, but a civilizational renewal. It asks a profound question: can education liberate minds instead of standardizing them?

In an age driven by technology and competition, NEP 2020 dares to blend ancient wisdom with modern innovation — reviving Gandhi’s vision of moral learning, Tagore’s ideal of creative freedom, and Mandela’s belief that education can change the world. It envisions classrooms where knowledge meets character, skill meets empathy, and learning becomes a lifelong journey.

At its heart, the policy seeks to transform India from a knowledge consumer to a knowledge creator — from a nation that studies the world to one that illumines it.

“Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire.” — W.B. Yeats

The National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020) marks a historic step in reforming India’s education system—from early childhood to higher education. Replacing the 1986 policy, it envisions an inclusive, flexible, and learner-centric system aligned with the needs of the 21st century and rooted in India’s cultural ethos.

Vision and Core Principles

The NEP 2020 seeks to build an education system that “contributes directly to transforming India into an equitable and vibrant knowledge society.”

It stands on five key pillars:

Access, Equity, Quality, Affordability, and Accountability.

This vision resonates with the spirit of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) — “Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.”

​1. The Foundational Decade (1947–1964): Building the Structure

​The immediate post-independence era focused on creating a constitutional and institutional framework for education.

​Constitutional Mandate: Article 45 of the Constitution (Part IV, Directive Principles) mandated the state to endeavor to provide free and compulsory education for all children until they complete the age of fourteen years.  

​Commissions: University Education Commission (1948–49): Also known as the Radhakrishnan Commission, it recommended the integration of liberal education with vocational training, laid the foundation for quality control, and led to the formal establishment of the University Grants Commission (UGC) in 1956.  

​Secondary Education Commission (1952–53): Also known as the Mudaliar Commission, it proposed a diversified curriculum and the 10+2+3 pattern (10 years of school, 2 years of higher secondary, and 3 years of degree course), which became the structural standard for decades.  

​Institutional Foundation: Premier technical and management institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) were established to develop high-quality human capital for nation-building.  

2. The Era of Kothari Commission and the First Policy (1964–1985)

​This period sought to link education directly to national development and societal needs.  

​Kothari Commission (1964–66)

​The D.S. Kothari Commission (formally the Education Commission) was the most comprehensive review, advocating a radical restructuring of the education system.

Key recommendations:  

​Education for National Development: The central theme was to make education a "powerful instrument of social, economic, and political change."  6% of GDP Target: It famously recommended that public expenditure on education should reach 6% of the national GDP (a target yet to be consistently met).  

​Common School System (CSS): Advocated for a neighborhood school system to promote social equity and national integration.  

​Three-Language Formula (TLF): Recommended teaching the mother tongue/regional language, Hindi, and English to promote multilingualism.  

​National Policy on Education (NPE 1968)

​Based on the Kothari Commission report, this was India's first official national policy on education.  

​Focus: Advocated for universal access, equalization of educational opportunities, and the adoption of the 10+2+3 structure nationwide.  

​Shift: Education was moved from the State List to the Concurrent List in 1976 (via the 42nd Amendment), giving the central government a formal role in policy and planning.  

3. The Shift to Modernization and Equity (1986–2009)

​The NPE of 1986 focused on modernizing education with a strong emphasis on equity and technology.  

​National Policy on Education (NPE 1986, Revised 1992)

​Universalization of Elementary Education (UEE): Focused on universal access, universal enrolment, and universal retention up to the age of 14.  

​Operation Blackboard (OB): A major initiative launched in 1987 to improve the infrastructure of primary schools, providing essential teaching-learning equipment, blackboards, and a minimum of two teachers in every primary school.  

Navodaya Vidyalayas (NVs): Establishment of pace-setting residential schools in rural areas to nurture talented children.  

​Open Learning: Expansion of the open university system, notably through the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU).  

​Technology: Introduction of computers in schools through the CLASS Project.

Right to Education (RTE) Act 2009

​This was a watershed moment that legally enforced the constitutional mandate.

​86th Constitutional Amendment (2002): Made education a Fundamental Right (Article 21A) for children aged 6 to 14 years.  

​RTE Act (2009): Provided the legislative framework for this right, making it free and compulsory for every child in this age group, and setting norms and standards for schools.  

​Major Schemes: This period also saw the launch of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) (2001) for elementary education and Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) (2009) for secondary education.

Philosophical Foundation: Indian and Global Thinkers

The ideals behind NEP 2020 reflect the timeless educational visions of great thinkers:

Mahatma Gandhi – Education for Life and Character

Gandhi’s concept of “Nai Talim” (Basic Education) emphasized learning through productive work, moral values, and self-reliance.

He believed: “By education, I mean an all-round drawing out of the best in child and man—body, mind and spirit.”

The NEP’s focus on experiential learning, vocational education, and value-based education closely aligns with Gandhian philosophy.

Rabindranath Tagore – Freedom and Creativity in Learning

Tagore’s Visva-Bharati model envisioned education as a journey of self-discovery, nature-based learning, and cultural harmony.

He said: “The highest education is that which does not merely give us information but makes our life in harmony with all existence.”

The NEP’s emphasis on holistic, multidisciplinary learning and arts integration carries forward Tagore’s humanistic vision.

Modern Global Educationists

Contemporary thinkers echo similar ideals:

Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam: “The purpose of education is to make good human beings with skill and expertise. Enlightened human beings can be created by teachers.”

Nelson Mandela: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”

UNESCO Vision (2020): Promotes education as a “common good”, focusing on creativity, sustainability, and global citizenship — themes reflected strongly in NEP 2020.

Key Reforms in School Education

The policy replaces the old 10+2 structure with a new 5+3+3+4 design (ages 3–18):

Foundational Stage (3–8 years): Play-based, activity-oriented Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE).

NIPUN Bharat has reached over 4.2 crore students across 8.9 lakh schools. PARAKH Rashtriya Sarvekshan (2024) highlights a significant improvement in FLN skills, with Grade 3 students in government schools outperforming private school students in Language and Maths (PIB, 2025).

Preparatory Stage (8–11 years): Interactive learning in literacy, numeracy, art, and science.

Middle Stage (11–14 years): Experiential and subject-based learning.

13,070 PM SHRI schools have been selected (out of a target of 14,500+), with a total scheme outlay of ₹27,360 crore (Central Share: ₹18,128 crore) for five years (2022-23 to 2026-27). ₹630.11 crore was released as the first installment to 6,207 schools (PIB, 2024).

Secondary Stage (14–18 years): Flexible subject choices and multidisciplinary study.

National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE) launched (2023), promoting experiential and competency-based learning. CBSE board exams now include 50% competency-based questions (PIB, 2025).

Other Highlights:

Universal Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) by Grade 3.

Vocational training and internships from Class 6.The number of schools offering vocational courses has increased significantly from 960 in 2014 to 29,342 in 2024. Student enrolment in skill education has surged from 58,720 in 2014 to over 30.8 lakh in 2024 (PIB, 2024).

Mother tongue/local language as medium of instruction till at least Grade 5.

PARAKH, a new national assessment body, to promote conceptual understanding over rote memorization.

Higher Education Reforms

Multidisciplinary Approach: All higher education institutions (HEIs) will evolve into multidisciplinary universities or autonomous colleges.The number of Universities grew from 723 in 2014 to 1,213 in 2024, and the number of IIMs increased from 13 to 21 (PIB, 2025).

Multiple Entry/Exit (MEE): Students can earn certificates, diplomas, or degrees based on years completed, supported by the Academic Bank of Credit (ABC).2,037 HEIs have onboarded ABC, and 30.13 crore APAAR IDs (Automated Permanent Academic Account Registry) have been created for students across school, HE, and skill institutes (PIB, 2024).

Regulation and Research: Establishment of Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) and National Research Foundation (NRF) to enhance quality, accountability, and innovation.Around 7,568 Institutions' Innovation Councils and 104 IDEA Labs have been set up to promote research and innovation (PIB, 2024).

Goal: Raise the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) to 50% by 2035.

Total enrolment in higher education reached 4.33 crore in 2021-22 (up from 3.42 crore in 2014-15). The GER rose to 28.4% in 2021-22 (from 23.7% in 2014-15). Female enrolment increased to 2.07 crore (PIB/AISHE, 2024).


Strengths of NEP 2020

1. Focus on Early Childhood Learning: Integrating ECCE and FLN builds a strong foundation for lifelong learning.

2. Flexibility and Holistic Growth: Breaking rigid subject barriers encourages creativity and interdisciplinary understanding.

3. Simplified Governance: A single regulatory structure ensures better quality control and institutional autonomy.

4. Integration of Indian Values: The policy blends traditional wisdom with modern educational demands.

Challenges and Concerns

Despite its visionary goals, the NEP faces several implementation challenges:

Funding Shortfall: The target of spending 6% of GDP on education remains unmet.

Public expenditure on education by the Central and State Governments continues to hover between 4.0% and 4.64% of GDP (PIB). The 6% target remains aspirational.

Teacher Training: Effective reform depends on retraining millions of teachers in new pedagogy.

Digital Divide: Rural areas still lack infrastructure for online learning.

Language Policy: Implementing multilingual education equitably is complex.

Privatization Risks: Greater autonomy could lead to commercialization and inequality.

Enrolment of SC students in HE increased by 44% and ST students by 65.2% between 2014-15 and 2021-22, indicating positive progress in access and equity (PIB, 2024).

Critical Reflection

NEP 2020 is a progressive blueprint rooted in both Indian philosophy and global educational best practices. However, its success depends on three key enablers:

1. Adequate funding and resource allocation.

2. Empowered, well-trained teachers.NISHTHA has been extended to cover all levels of schooling, with over 14 lakh teachers trained across ECCE and FLN (PIB, 2025).

3. Inclusive digital and linguistic access for all learners.DIKSHA serves as the national EdTech platform. SWAYAM (online courses) has seen 5.15 crore+ enrolments (PIB, 2025). Dedicated TV channels under PM e-VIDYA have been extended to 200 channels.

Without these, the NEP’s promise may remain largely aspirational.


                    Conclusion

Conclusion: Towards an Enlightened Republic of Learning


The National Education Policy 2020 is more than an administrative reform — it is India’s moral and intellectual declaration for the 21st century. It seeks not only to universalize schooling but to humanize education — to create citizens who can think freely, act ethically, and innovate fearlessly. Rooted in Gandhi’s vision of education for character, Tagore’s freedom in learning, and Mandela’s faith in transformation, the NEP aspires to make India a knowledge civilization rather than merely a knowledge economy.


Yet its true measure will lie not in policy documents but in classrooms — in how teachers teach, how children learn, and how society values both. If adequately funded, inclusively implemented, and ethically guided, NEP 2020 can turn India’s demographic potential into a moral and creative force.


In essence, education must evolve from literacy to liberation, from enrolment to enlightenment. Only then will India rise as a nation where learning becomes a lifelong pursuit and knowledge a pathway to wisdom.


“The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled.” — Plutarch

                     Inspirational Takeaway

 “Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.” — Mahatma Gandhi


No comments:

Post a Comment

“Can the National Education Policy 2020 Move Beyond Vision to Become a Real Catalyst for Change in India’s Education System?”, “Is NEP 2020 an Ambitious Leap Toward Educational Transformation—or Just Another Policy Promise?”

Introduction: Education as the Soul of a Nation Education has never been merely a tool of instruction — it is the art of nation-making. A so...